The REAL Elena Ferrante
To write, to write with purpose, to write better than I had already. And to study the stories of the past and the present to understand how they worked, and to learn, to learn everything about the world with the sole purpose of constructing living hearts, which no one could ever do better than me…
These are the thoughts of Elena Greco, the narrator of Elena Ferrante’s stunning four-book series of Neapolitan novels. But this is also the author herself, proclaiming her purpose. It is every author proclaiming her purpose, setting her intentions.
And that’s why, as I read the novels, I was content not knowing who “Elena Ferrante” really was. I knew who she was. She was a woman writing. She was a woman giving voice not just to her narrator but to every woman who is bold and then doubts herself, who works for success and then questions whether she deserves it, who is wary because that’s what a woman has to be in this world, who pretends and knows she pretends and beats herself up for pretending and then pretends again. A woman whose interior monolog is richer and deeper and darker than anyone can imagine.
The author, despite extraordinary international acclaim, chose privacy. She chose to remain cloaked in a pseudonym, and I loved that. I loved it because it allowed me to feel the work, to be fully immersed in the work. I loved it because, at a time when every author (myself included) lusts for media attention and shouts me me me on any and all social media channels, this author was letting the work speak for itself. This author put the characters first. And the setting. And the force of culture and history.
And then…the revelation.
An Italian investigative reporter, who apparently had nothing more pressing to do (may I suggest, for starters, investigating the stranglehold the Camorra has on Naples? Italy’s astonishing unemployment rate?) took it upon himself to paw through financial records and real estate records and unmask the “real” Elena Ferrante.
Asked why he would want to delve into the identity of Ms. Ferrante, whose readers value her anonymity, the journalist, Claudio Gatti said he was just doing his job.
Right.
If his job is making a name for himself. If his job is (temporarily) one-upping the most widely read, most respected FEMALE novelist of our time. He is like so many of the male characters in Ferrante’s novels – loud voice, small mind, clueless about and simultaneously jealous of the power of a woman.
He wants to steal Elena Ferrante from us. But we know who she is, and we won’t let him.
2 comments
Omigawd, Lauren, did you see Stig Abell’s take in the Times Literary Supplement? Now that the horse is out of the barn, and all that’s left to us is the cold comfort of schadenfreude — but I almost feel sorry for Claudio Gatto after reading that take-down. It’s so civil, measured, thoughtful and merciless. If you haven’t read it — http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/tls-not-named-elena-ferrante/
cheers! –fz
TLS editor says he would not have published Gatti’s piece — and says it smacks of “mansplaining.” Thanks for the link to the article.
Leave a Comment