Three cheers for omega-3s
In the wild wild west of supplements, the land of deer antler spray, lamb placenta and noni juice (yes, really) where we’re bombarded with claims and testimonials and celebrity endorsements, it’s a challenge to figure what is good (or at least promising) for those of us who want to tip the balance toward health and vitality as we age.
It’s a great day when real science supplants hucksterism, and we can learn something credible and useful about an anti-aging supplement, Such is the most recent news about Omega-3s. This is a supplement I take, my decision based on persuasive research that Omega 3s (an essential fatty acid found in cold water fish like salmon) are powerful anti-inflammatory. Inflammation is implicated in a host of chronic diseases that fast-forward the aging process.
Now there’s more evidence about the health and anti-aging benefits of omega-3s – this time about the link between this supplement and longer telomeres.
What are telomeres and why do we care if they’re long or short? Glad you asked. Telomeres are the end-caps on our chromosomes that protect them from wear and tear (and death). Long telomeres signal biological youth. Shortened telomeres, not so much. Or, in science speak: “It is becoming increasingly evident that damage specific to the telomeric ends of chromosomes is one of the most critical events that initiate genome instability leading to accelerated ageing, cognitive decline and neurodegenerative disease.” Got that? As I said: Long telomeres, good. Short telomeres, bad. (I had mine tested during my counterclockwise journey and wrote about it in the book.)
A new study from Australian researchers – a randomized clinical trail (the gold standard), albeit a small, pilot study — found that omega-3 supplementation was associated with “reduced shortening” of telomeres. This echoes UC/ SF research that found links between omega-3s and slower cellular ageing in people with coronary disease as well as another study that linked omega-3s to improved cognitive ability. If you’re not taking this supplement, you should consider it.
Almost as interesting as the good news about omega-3s is the mirror-image bad news that emerged from the recent Australian study. The people who exhibited the greatest shortening of telomere length (remember, short=bad) were those with the highest intake of omega-6s. While omega-3s are hard to get in our modern diet, omega-6s are way too easy. Snack foods, fast foods, cookies, crackers and sweets often contain refined vegetable oils, a major source of omega-6s. More proof – if we needed any more proof – that the American junk food diet is aging us from the inside out.
(Thanks to Dr. Andrew Elliot, the guy behind my telomere testing, for alerting me to this study.)
4 comments
Lauren – As usual, breaking it all down so we don’t have to. Thank you. But I want more. Can you make any specific recommendations about brands or kinds of mgs or whatnots that are more regulated or more trustworthy? I always feel like I go on a kick, spend $150 on supplements and such that have never been tested or regulated and could all just be crap. And, is there any truth to the late-night TV infomercial about how much better ‘Krill’ is for us than regular fish oil? As always – I’m lost without you.
Oh, Pam, you are soooo not lost without me. But thanks. Here’s what I know: Krill oil and fish oil are pretty much the same. Reason to choose krill would be it’s at the bottom of the food chain (teeny tiny shrimp that whales eat), so less chance of contamination/ pollution. Reason not to choose it: You have a shellfish allergy — or you keep kosher. Buying fish oil supplements you look for oil derived from “wild caught” cold water fish. Anyone can say that any product has been “tested” in the mostly unregulated world of supplements, so I wouldn’t trust that designation. You want to choose a capsule that has at least 600 DHA for a daily dose. Also good if it doesn’t contain anything other than fish oil (DHA and EPA) as you can overload on E (often included in fish oil capsules) if you are also taking a multi.
Lauren,
I heard you on Think Out Loud today. Thank you for your research and book.
I am a ovarian cancer survivor and have been through chemo treatment twice. I am happy to be alive and I have been wondering how the chemo might have advanced my biological age. Also, could you share the supplements you are taking.
Thanks.
Thanks for visiting the site, Martha. Hope you become a regular. (I post every Wednesday.) It’s worth researching the individual drugs that were a part of your chemo regimen to see what other effects they may have had. I do talk about the supplements I researched and decided to take. I devote most of an entire chapter to the (essentially) wild wild west of supplements — an unregulated world. Hope you’ll take a look.
Leave a Comment